A　Cultural　Study　of　Evasive　Answers　in　the　SinoUS　Press　Conference“闪避回答”的文化研究——以中美新闻发言为例_钱亚旭, 张秦, 著_9787564368593

本书为研究闪避回答在不同文化语境中使用模式和特点的全英文学术著作。闪避回答是在公开正式场合遇到尖锐问题和不方便即时回答的情况时常为发言人所采用的一种策略。本书首先总结前人相关研究，明确了闪避回答的定义、分类和功能，继而基于合作原则和关联理论指出使用闪避回答的必要性以及常用的几种模式，之后结合中国和美国新闻发言中的实例说明不同国家在使用闪避回答时的不同特点，并试着分析其历史、文化等根源。书稿的特点在于从重建（增加、减少、转变）语境和利用语境角度总结了闪避回答的使用模式，并将问与答作为一个整体来加以研究。

《“闪避回答”的文化研究：以中美新闻发言为例（英文）》：
　　Although some approaches are intended to explain and analyze the evasive answer inprevious years such as the semantic theory and the functional theory， this book investigates it from a different perspective on the basis of previous researches， that is， a cognitive pragmatic study. The study of evasive answer is of theoretical significance because a new theory-the relevance theory is applied to this research， and it is also of applicable importance because evasion is a common strategy used by politicians to deal with sticky questions. The cultural interpretation， then， could further explain the value differentiation and similarities between the manifestations of Sino-US diplomatic discourses. During those explorations， different theories from the interdisciplinary perspective would be applies in the data observation and analysis. Theories of identity， nationalism as well as cognitive pragmatics could be used to shed light on the research object.
　　As for the cognitive theoretical framework， since this study intends to explain how cognitive context works in our minds to successfully generate the evasive answer， the intended theoretical value is to refine theories on evasive answers， which could enable us to access to a better understanding of the conception of evasiveness. Because this study is intended to abstract a model of evasively answering under the guideline of the Relevance Theory， in this sense， the present study will also be contributed to the possible significance of theoretical construction.
　　Besides， this theoretical significance could directly bring about the applicable significance. As to application， the present study will also provide diplomatic respondents with ostensive information to tackle different questions， especially those implicational leading questions. In other words， it will also show how to use those theories in real political environments to become a better spokesperson or politician， especially in the circumstances of Sino-US cultural comparisons and contrasts. Thus， the present book will also be of some applicable significance by suggesting concrete ways to solve the answering problems in political context.
　　4.1 Discussions on the Basis of Framework
　　The purpose of the present chapter is to present and explain the conceptual framework that is developed via observing and examining the data collected for the present study. It starts with a brief synopsis of the problems in the existing studies on evasion so as to lay the foundation and to understand the necessity of our proposing a conceptual framework of evasion from the cognitive pragmatic perspective. The present conceptual framework， intends to explain how answerers can successfully use evasive strategies via the Relevance Theory， and the concept of cognitive context in Relevance Theory will be attempted to develop by the application in analyzing evasive strategies in diplomatic discourses， Thus， we can further analyze the mechanism underlying evasion in it.
　　……

你还可能感兴趣

A　Cultural　Study　of　Evasive　Answers　in　the　SinoUS　Press　Conference“闪避回答”的文化研究——以中美新闻发言为例

我要评论