新闻学与传播学经典丛书·英文原版系列:个性动力论(英文版)
定 价:39 元
丛书名: 新闻学与传播学经典丛书·英文原版系列
- 作者:[美] 库特·卢因(Kurt Lewin) 著;展江,保道宽 编
- 出版时间:2013/9/1
- ISBN:9787565707711
- 出 版 社:中国传媒大学出版社
- 中图法分类:B848
- 页码:348
- 纸张:胶版纸
- 版次:1
- 开本:32开
The present book is a collection of originally independent articles which were written at different times and for quite different occasions. Hence,the reader will find some of the fundamental i-deas recurring throughout the book. The selection has been made in order to give a picture of the fields thus far studied,the psy-chology of the person and of the environment,ancl at the same time to inclicate their connections with the various applied fields,
especially child psychology, pedagogy, psychopathology, charac-terology,and social psychology.
Only a few years ago one could observe,at least among Ger-man psychologists,a quite pessimistic mood. After the initial suc-cesses of experimental psychology in its early stages, it seemed to become clearer and clearer that it would remain impossible for ex-perimental method to press on beyond the psychology of perception and memory to such vital problems as those with which psychoanalysis was concerned. Weighty "philosophical" and"method-ological" considerations seemed to make such an undertaking apriori impossible.
《新闻学与传播学经典丛书·英文原版系列:个性动力论(英文版)》将格式塔心理学原理用于研究动机、人格及团体社会历程!
作者系传播学奠基人之一!
前言
译者前言
第一章 亚里士多德和伽利略思维模式在当代心理学中的冲
第二章 意识的结构
第三章 环境在儿童行为及发展中的作用
第四章 奖惩对应的心理状态
第五章 基于现实的教育
第六章 替代活动及其价值
第七章 低能的动力学理论
第八章 实验性调查测评
人名索引
关键词索引
Aristotelicrn Concepts
Fortuitousness o f the Individual Case. The concept forma-tion of psychology is dominated,just as was that of Aristotelianphysics,by the question of regularity in the sense of frequency.This is obvious in its immediate attitude toward particular phe-nomena as well as in its attitude toward lawfulness. If, for exam-ple,one show a film of a concrete incident in the behavior of a cer-tain child,the first question of the psychologist usually is: "Do all children do that,or is it at least common ?" And if one must an-swer this question in the negative the behavior involved loses for that psychologist all or almost all claim to scientific interest. To pay attention to such an "exceptional case" seems to him a scien-tifically unimportant bit of folly.
The real attitude of the investigator toward particular events and the problem of individuality is perhaps more clearly expressed in this actual behavior than in many theories. The individual event seems to him fortuitous, unimportant, scientifically indifferent. It may,however,be some extraordinary event,some tremendous ex-perience,something that has critically determined the destiny of the person involved,or the appearance of an historically significant personality. In such a case it is customary to emphasize the "mys-tical" character of all individuality and originality,comprehensible only to "intuition," or at least not to science.
Both of these attitudes toward the particular event lead to the same conclusion: that that which does not occur repeatedly lies outside the realm of the comprehensible. La'w fuLness as Frequency. The esteem in which frequency is held in present-day psychology is due to the fact that it is still considered a question whether, and if so how far, the psychical world is lawful,just as in Aristotelian physics this esteem was due to a similar uncertainty about lawfulness in the physical world. It is not necessary here to describe at length the vicissitudes of the thesis of the lawfulness of the psychic in philosophical discussion. It is sufficient to recall that even at present there arc many tend-encies to limit the operation of law to certain "lower" spheres of psychical events. For us it is more important to note that the field which is considered lawful, not in principle,but in the actual re-search of psychology-even of experimental psychology-has only been extended very gradually. If psychology has only very gradu-ally and hesitantly pushed beyond the bounds of sensory psychol-ogy into the fields of will and affect,it is certainly due not only to technical difficulties,but mainly to the fact that in this field actual repetition,a recurrence of the same event,is not to be expected. And this repetition remains,as it did for Aristotle,to a large ex-tent the basis for the assumption of the lawfulness or intelligibili-ty of an event.
……